a former friend of the founder denounces the company

He had already filed a complaint several times, but this time the lawsuit was allowed to be heard. A judge of the Superior Court of Alameda, in the United States, has rejected Pinterest’s request to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Christine Martínez, meaning a trial must be held this time.

Pinterest went public in 2019

What does the question consist of? Christine Martinez was a friend of one of the platform’s founders, Ben Silbermann, and notes that she helped create Pinterest even though she had no contract or employment relationship with the company. However, her boyfriend asked her to help them develop some Pinterest products and features, which she agreed to “breathe the business back on.”

All this happened then Pinterest was not a popular tool, nor did it bring together hundreds of millions of users. What happens is that after Pinterest became popular and, in 2019 it went public after a public offering of shares. This made the founders and shareholders a lot of money, and Christine Martinez assures that she played a fundamental role in that transformation of the company, for which she is claiming compensation, or rather, your “piece of the pie”.

According to Martinez, an expert in digital marketing, her contribution to the development of key functionalities in the platform, such as dashboards, has undoubtedly led to the growth of the company and obtaining strong revenues.

The guideline also ensures that an ambitious marketing plan has been drawn up to promote the tool to a large list of bloggers, among others. As he told The New York Times, “He helped his friends, who had no marketing knowledge, to create a product aimed at the female audience«.

Martínez had already denounced Pinterest last September, but the company managed to have the lawsuit dismissed in December, claiming that Martínez’s requests were very timed and that any form of compensation would have been prescribed.

However, Silbermann’s former boyfriend has not stopped her efforts to get compensation for the work she has done, as despite not having an employment relationship or contract, she can prove what tasks she performed and what their impact was. on the future of the company.

Source link